http://hdl.handle.net/1765/189
series: ERS-2002-36-MKT

Means-End Relations


Research Paper
This publication is part of collection
Related Files
asset icon
(erimrs20020408084827.pdf, 1.1MB)

Means-end relations are generally assumed to be hierarchical, and, by implication, asymmetrical. That is, if A is a means to achieve B, B is not at the same time also a means to achieve A. Literature casting doubt on this directedness of means-end relations is reviewed, and the hypothesis of means-end relations having direction is tested in two empirical studies. In these studies the means-end relations turn out to be symmetrical rather than asymmetrical. Means-end structures may therefore better be conceptualized as semantic networks rather than as straight hierarchies. Consequently, for the presentation and interpretation of the results from means-end studies, the emphasis should be on elements that derive from the network nature of the cognitive structure and not from the (possibly misleading) notions of hierarchy.



Keywords


Classifications using Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) Classification System
Automatically Extracted Terms
  • concept
  • means-end
  • respondent
  • means-end relations
  • relation
  • study
  • network
  • laddering
  • implication matrix
  • number
  • table
  • structure
  • implication
  • matrix
  • marketing
  • research
  • analysis
  • figure
  • hierarchy
  • value