http://hdl.handle.net/1765/19413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-008-0101-x
pubmed: 18340472
scopus: cited 27 times
web of science: cited 24 times
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-008-0101-x
pubmed: 18340472
scopus: cited 27 times
web of science: cited 24 times
Comparing methodologies for the cost estimation of hospital services
February 2009
Article
volume 10, issue 1 pp 39-45.
| Related Files |
|---|
|
Redirect to Publisher's version
(Publisher's version.url.txt, 43 bytes) |
Repository contains one additional file which is not publicly available
The aim of the study was to determine whether the total cost estimate of a hospital service remains reliable when the cost components of bottom-up microcosting were replaced by the cost components of top-down microcosting or gross costing. Total cost estimates were determined in representative general hospitals in the Netherlands for appendectomy, normal delivery, stroke and acute myocardial infarction for 2005. It was concluded that restricting the use of bottom-up microcosting to those cost components that have a great impact on the total costs (i.e., labour and inpatient stay) would likely result in reliable cost estimates.
Keywords
- Humans
- Netherlands
- *Models, Economic
- *Hospital Costs
- Appendectomy/economics
- Delivery, Obstetric/economics
- Hospitals, General
- Myocardial Infarction/economics
- Stroke/economics