A reply to Gandjour and Gafni
March 2010
Article
volume 29, issue 2 pp 329-331.
| Related Files |
|---|
|
Redirect to publisher's version
(publisher's version.url.txt, 48 bytes) |
Repository contains one additional file which is not publicly available
Gandjour and Gafni (2010) criticize our paper on two counts. Their first point of criticism is ill-founded and results from many mathematical mistakes that they make. The second is due to a lack of understanding of the general principles of empirical research.
Keywords
