Costs and effects in therapy for acute coronary syndromes: The case of abciximab in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the EPIC study
1998-04-23
Article
| Related Files |
|---|
|
Redirect to publisher's version
(publisher's version.url.txt, 47 bytes) |
Cost-effectiveness analyses are routinely performed to determine whether the additional cost of a novel therapy is balanced by additional effectiveness. The definitions of costs and effects involve a variety of assumptions, both in general economic terms and with regard to the specific medical setting under consideration. Similarly, differing criteria for acceptability of cost-effectiveness estimates can be used to generate different conclusions regarding cost-effectiveness. The issues and problems inherent in economic evaluation are discussed by an analysis of findings with the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab in the EPIC (Evaluation of 7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications) study in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
- Human
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- United States
- Treatment Outcome
- Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex/*antagonists & inhibitors
- Randomized Controlled Trials
- 0 (Antibodies, Monoclonal)
- 0 (Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors)
- *Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary/economics
- 0 (Immunoglobulins, Fab)
- 0 (Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex)
- 143653-53-6 (abciximab)
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/economics/*therapeutic use
- Immunoglobulins, Fab/economics/*therapeutic use
- Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/economics/*therapeutic use
- Coronary Disease/drug therapy/economics/*therapy