Deal or No Deal? Decision-making under Risk in a Large-payoff Game Show
2006-01-11
Research Paper
| Related Files |
|---|
View PDF Version
(2006-0992.pdf, 0.3MB) |
The popular television game show deal or No Deal offers a unique opportunity for analyzing decision making under risk: it involves very large stakes, simple take-or-leave decisions that require minimal skill or strategy and near-certainty about the probability distribution. Based on a panel data set of the choices of contestants in all game rounds of 53 episodes from Australia and the Netherlands, we find an average Pratt-Arrow relative risk aversion (RRA) between roughly 1 and 2 for initial wealth levels between 0 and 50,000. The RRA differs substantially across the contestants and some even exhibit risk seeking behavior. The cross-sectional differences in RRA can be explained in large part by the previous outcomes experienced by the contestants during the game. Most notably, consistent with the break-even effect,the RRA strongly decreases following earlier losses and risk seeking arises after large losses.
To be published in American Economic Review
- D81 : Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
- C23 : Models with Panel Data
- C93 : Field Experiments
- >@ e 7/7p
- od f 7/
- 4+444
- .0 7
- 5 5
- +< 5
- 4+44
- 1+44
- institute
- tinbergen institute
- tinbergen
- 75 /
- 4+-
- 1+41
- .240
- .20
- rotterdam
- amsterdam
- 87!
- 34 5
