This paper investigates how letting people predict others’ choices under risk affects subsequent own choices. We find an improvement of strong rationality (risk neutrality) for losses in own choices, but no such improvement for gains. There is no improvement of weak rationality (avoiding preference reversals). Overall, risk aversion in own choices increases. Conversely, for the effects of own choices on predicting for others, the risk aversion predicted in others’ choices is reduced if preceded by own choices, for both gains and losses. Remarkably, we find a new probability matching paradox at the group level. Relative to preceding studies on the effects of predicting others’ choices, we added real incentives, pure framing effects, and simplicity of stimuli. Our stimuli were maximally targeted towards our research questions.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Framing effects, Predicting others’ choices, Risk attitudes, Self-other discrepancy, Social comparisons
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11166-017-9253-3, hdl.handle.net/1765/100142
Journal Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Citation
Li, Z. (Zhihua), Rohde, K.I.M, & Wakker, P.P. (2017). Improving one’s choices by putting oneself in others’ shoes – An experimental analysis. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11166-017-9253-3