Purpose: The purpose of this research note was to Results: Analyses of variance showed that children with validate a simplified version of the Dutch nonword SLI + RI performed significantly worse than other participant repetition task (NWR; Rispens & Baker, 2012). The NWR groups in NWR-S, just as in NWR. Logistic regression analyses was shortened and scoring was transformed to correct/ showed that both tasks can predict an SLI + RI outcome. incorrect nonwords, resulting in the shortened NWR NWR-S holds a sensitivity of 82.6% and a specificity of (NWR-S). 95.4% in identifying children with SLI + RI. The sensitivity Method: NWR-S and NWR performance were compared of the original NWR is 87.0% with a specificity of 87.7%. in the previously published data set of Rispens and Baker Conclusions: As the original NWR, the NWR-S comprising (2012; N = 88), who compared NWR performance in a subset of 22 nonwords scored with a simplified scoring 5 participant groups: specific language impairment (SLI), system can identify children with combined SLI and RI while reading impairment (RI), both SLI and RI, one control group saving a significant amount of the needed assessment time. matched on chronological age, and one control group Supplemental Materials: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha. matched on language age. 5150116

Additional Metadata
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0060, hdl.handle.net/1765/101450
Journal Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Note no subscription
Citation
le Clercq, C.M.P, van der Schroeff, M.P, Rispens, J.E. (Judith E.), Ruytjens, L, Goedegebure, A, Van Ingen, G, & Franken, M.-C. (2017). Shortened nonword repetition task (NWR-S): A simple, quick, and less expensive outcome to identify children with combined specific language and reading impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(8), 2241–2248. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0060