Post-BEPS Tax Advisory and Tax Structuring from a Tax Practitioner’s View
The international tax landscape is changing and it is changing fast. The political perception is that taxation of multinational enterprises is not aligned with the ‘economic activity’ that produces their profits (i.e. not aligned with ‘value creation’). The perception links ‘value creation’ with ‘employees and sales’. In the BEPS Project of the OECD, the OECD attempts to combat base erosion and profit shifting and to align taxation with value creation. In this article, the authors discuss the impact they expect BEPS to have on tax advisory and tax planning. The focus goes to BEPS Actions 7, 8-10 and 13. By maintaining the separate entity approach under BEPS for the taxation of multinationals, has the OECD been forced to ‘stretch’ existing rules beyond their limits? Will the created uncertainty lead to a shift from ‘aggressive tax planning’ by multinationals to ‘aggressive tax collection’ by tax administrations? Will the role of tax advisory change from advising on the lowest possible effective tax rate to a broader advice including risk appetite and public expectations?
|Keywords||BEPS, value creation, tax structuring, international taxation|
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000083, hdl.handle.net/1765/101733|
|Series||Erasmus Law Review|
|Journal||Erasmus Law Review|
Lankhorst, P, & van Dam, H. (2017). Post-BEPS Tax Advisory and Tax Structuring from a Tax Practitioner’s View. Erasmus Law Review, 10(1), 60–74. doi:10.5553/ELR.000083