Aims Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) provides definitive valve replacement through a minimally invasive procedure. In the setting of TMVR, it remains unclear how relevant the differences between different mitral annular (MA) diameters are. We sought to define a simplified and reproducible method to describe the MA size. Methods and results Using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA) studies of 47 patients, 3D MA perimeter (P3D) was annotated. The aorto-mitral continuity was excluded from MA contour either by manual annotation (yielding a saddle-shape model) or by simple truncation at the medial and lateral trigones (yielding a D-shape model). The method of the least squares was used to generate the projected MA area (Aproj) and perimeter (Pproj). Intercommissural (IC) and septolateral (SL) diameters, Dmean = (IC diameter ± SL diameter)/2, area-derived diameter (DArea = 2 × √ (A/π) and perimeterderived diameter (DPerimeter = P/p) were measured. MA eccentricity, height, and calcification (MAC) were assessed. Thirty studies were re-read by the same and by another observer to test intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. Patients (age, 75±12 years, 66% males) had a wide range of mitral regurgitation severity (none-trace in 8%, mild in 55%, moderate-severe in 37%), MA size (area: 5-16 cm2), eccentricity (28-52%), and height (3-11 mm). MAC was seen in 11 cases, in whom MAC arc occupied 26±20% of the MA circumference. DArea (36.0±4.0 mm) and DPerimeter (37.1±3.8 mm) correlated strongly (R2 = 0.97) and were not significantly different (P = 0.15). The IC (39.3±4.6 mm) and the SL (31.4±4.5 mm) diameters were significantly different from DArea (P < 0.001) while Dmean (35.4±4.0 mm) was not (P = 0.5). The correlation of DArea was stronger with Dmean (R2 = 0.96) than with IC and SL diameters (R2 = 0.69 and 0.76, respectively). The average difference between DArea and Dmean was ±0.6 mm and the 95% limits of agreement were 2.1 and 20.9 mm. Similar results were found when the D-shape model was applied. All MA diameters showed good reproducibility with high intraclass correlation coefficient (0.93-0.98), small average bias (0.37-1.1 mm), and low coefficient of variation (3-7%) for intra- and inter-observer comparisons. Reproducibility of DArea was lower in patients with MAC. Conclusion MA sizing by CTA is readily feasible and reproducible. Dmean is a simple index that can be used to infer the effective MA size.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Computed tomography, Mitral annulus, Mitral regurgitation, Mitral valve, Transcatheter mitral valve replacement
Persistent URL,
Journal European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
Abdelghani, M, Spitzer, E, Soliman, O.I.I, Beitzke, D. (Dietrich), Laggner, R. (Roberta), Cavalcante, R, … Serruys, P.W.J.C. (2017). A simplified and reproducible method to size the mitral annulus: Implications for transcatheter mitral valve replacement. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, 18(6), 697–706. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jew132