Background Hepatic artery complications are feared complications after liver transplantation and may compromise the biliary tract, graft, and patient survival. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare risk of hepatic artery and biliary complications after liver transplantation in patients who underwent neoadjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) versus no TACE.
Methods Comprehensive searches were performed in Embase, MEDLINE OvidSP, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases to identify studies concerning hepatocellular cancer patients undergoing preliver transplantation TACE. Quality assessment of studies was done by the validated checklist of Downs and Black. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the incidence of all hepatic artery complications, hepatic artery thrombosis, and biliary tract complications, using binary random-effect models.
Results Fourteen retrospective studies, representing 1122 TACE patients, met the inclusion criteria. Postoperative hepatic artery complications consisted of hepatic artery thrombosis, stenosis, and (pseudo)-aneurysms. Preliver transplantation TACE was significantly associated with occurrence of posttransplant hepatic artery complications (odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.26; P = 0.02). No significant association between neoadjuvant TACE and hepatic artery thrombosis alone or biliary tract complications was found.
Conclusions Patients treated with TACE before liver transplantation may be at increased risk for development of hepatic artery complications after liver transplantation.

Additional Metadata
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001936, hdl.handle.net/1765/103964
Journal Transplantation
Citation
Sneiders, D. (Dimitri), Houwen, T, Pengel, L.H.M. (Liset H.M.), Polak, W.G, Dor, F.J.M.F, & Hartog, H. (2018). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Posttransplant Hepatic Artery and Biliary Complications in Patients Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization before Liver Transplantation. Transplantation, 102(1), 88–96. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000001936