This article distinguishes three discourses of reflexivity in relation to human inquiry. One of these arises from a post-modern, relational constructionist perspective which radically re-conceptualizes reflexivity: (a) as a local and co-constructed process oriented towards the question (b) how are we 'going on' together, and therefore paying attention to (c) the realities and relations we are co-creating during the research process and so (d) is concerned with local pragmatic and ethical issues (Gergen & Hosking, 2006; McNamee, 1994) rather than with the quality of truth claims. Regular reflexive dialogues as part of, and directed at, the research process can heighten the local use value of research for all participants and can facilitate new possible realities and relations.

Reflexivity, Relational Responsibility, Responsive Inquiry, Relational Constructionism, Postmodernism, and Ethics
dx.doi.org/http://bettinepluut.nl/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/reconstructing-reflexivity.pdf, hdl.handle.net/1765/104338
The Qualitative Report
Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM)

Hosking, D.M, & Pluut, B. (2010). (Re)constructing reflexivity: a relational constructionist approach. The Qualitative Report, 15(1), 59–75. doi:http://bettinepluut.nl/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/reconstructing-reflexivity.pdf