This paper address the idea of interlegality from the perspective of legal theory. Talking about interlegality inevitably leads to a consideration of legal orders between which linkages and connections appear. Interlegality is sometimes described as a process of mixing elements of different legal orders to create a new legal order. In this contribution, the concept of ‘legal order’ is reconsidered in light of the discussions of interlegality. More specifically, a notion of legal order as a system is contrasted with legal order as an interactional practice. Interlegality highlights plurality and tension which is problematic in a systemic view of legal order, and can be absorbed in an interactional view. However, taking the practice view to its limits may lead to a collapse of the notion of order altogether. Given the prominence of the value of coherence in legal thought, complete abandonment of the notion of legal order seems a step too far. This contribution considers how an interactional view of order may incorporate elements of systemic order in order to do justice to interlegality as a phenomenon of our legal world, ranging from the local to the transnational context.

Additional Metadata
Keywords legal pluralism, legal theory, transnational law, interactional law, legal anthropology, concept of law
Persistent URL hdl.handle.net/1765/104970
Journal Jan Klabbers & Gianluigi Palombella, The Challenges of Interlegality, Forthcoming Cambridge University Press.
Citation
Taekema, H.S. (2017). Between or Beyond Legal Orders: Questioning the Concept of Legal Order in Light of Interlegality. Jan Klabbers & Gianluigi Palombella, The Challenges of Interlegality, Forthcoming Cambridge University Press.. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/104970