Study objective - The aim of the study was to evaluate whether invasive blood pressure responses to orthostatic stress can be replaced by non-invasive continuous finger blood pressure responses.
Design - Intrabrachial and Finapres blood pressures were simultaneously measured during passive head up tilt and during active standing from the supine or sitting position in healthy volunteers.Subjects - Subjects (n=ll) were healthy males aged 22-40 years, mean age 30 years.
Measurements and main results - Beat to beat values of systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were calculated for both methods of measurement and the differences compared during a 30 s control period before, and during the first 120 s after, the change of posture. In the control period the difference between finger pressure and intra-arterial pressure was +2 (SD11) mm Hg for systolic, -4(8) mm Hg for mean, and -3(7) mm Hg for diastolic pressure. Compared to these control differences, the average finger minus intra-arterial pressure differences for mean and diastolic pressures during the three orthostatic manoeuvres were always within the range -6 to +6 mm Hg. The average systolic deviations were larger, ranging from -10 to +11 mm Hg. Despite these differences the characteristic changes in intra-arterial pressure during the initial phase (first 30 s after change of posture), as well as during the early steady state phase (1-2 min after the change of posture) were well reflected by finger pressure measurements in all subjecs.
Conclusions - For the assessment of the continuous blood pressure responses to orthostatic stress similar information can be obtained with non-invasive Finapres blood pressure recordings as with invasive recordings.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Continuous finger blood pressure, Intra-arterial blood pressure, Orthostatic stress
Persistent URL,
Journal Cardiovascular Research
Imholz, B.P, Settels, J.J, van den Meiracker, A.H, Wesseling, K.H, & Wieling, W. (1990). Non-invasive continuous finger blood pressure measurement during orthostatic stress compared to intra-arterial pressure. Cardiovascular Research (Vol. 24, pp. 214–221). doi:10.1093/cvr/24.3.214