Background People with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience more health problems and have different lifestyle change needs, compared with the general population. Aims To improve lifestyle change interventions for people with ID, this review examined how behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were applied in interventions aimed at physical activity, nutrition or physical activity and nutrition, and described their quality. Methods and procedures After a broad search and detailed selection process, 45 studies were included in the review. For coding BCTs, the CALO-RE taxonomy was used. To assess the quality of the interventions, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used. Extracted data included general study characteristics and intervention characteristics. Outcomes and results All interventions used BCTs, although theory-driven BCTs were rarely used. The most frequently used BCTs were ‘provide information on consequences of behaviour in general’ and ‘plan social support/social change’. Most studies were of low quality and a theoretical framework was often missing. Conclusion and implications This review shows that BCTs are frequently applied in lifestyle change interventions. To further improve effectiveness, these lifestyle change interventions could benefit from using a theoretical framework, a detailed intervention description and an appropriate and reliable intervention design which is tailored to people with ID.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Behaviour change technique, Health promotion, Intellectual disability, Lifestyle change intervention, Nutrition, Physical activity, Physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.10.008, hdl.handle.net/1765/108226
Journal Research in Developmental Disabilities
Citation
Willems, M. (Mariël), Hilgenkamp, T.I.M, Havik, E. (Else), Waninge, A, & Melville, C.A. (Craig A.). (2017). Use of behaviour change techniques in lifestyle change interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities (Vol. 60, pp. 256–268). doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2016.10.008