Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-36 in untreated patients with symptoms of intermittent claudication
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research , Volume 7 - Issue 6 p. 535- 548
Aim: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) descriptions and utility scores in newly diagnosed peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients, using two most widely used instruments, EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) and Medical Outcome Study 36-item Short-Form Health Status Survey (SF-36). Methods: Patients' self-assessment of HRQoL was measured by the Dutch versions of the EQ-5D and SF-36 in the 204 patients. Results: Mean utility scores ranged from 0.675 for Short-Form Six-Dimension, 0.648 for the EQ-5D UK tariff and 0.715 for the Dutch EQ-5D tariff. A moderate correlation between the utility scores was found due to different valuation techniques of these instruments. Conclusion: Both instruments have clinical validity for use in the PAD and can be used alongside each other to provide a holistic assessment of the HRQoL. Before using these two instruments interchangeably for utility score calculations and healthcare resource allocation, a thorough sensitivity analysis is necessary to explore the robustness of the value argument based on these utility scores.
|, , ,|
|Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research|
|Organisation||Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM)|
Vaidya, A, Kleinegris, M.-C, Severens, J.L, Ramaekers, B.L.T, Ten Cate-Hoek, A.J, ten Cate, H, & Joore, M.A. (2018). Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-36 in untreated patients with symptoms of intermittent claudication. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 7(6), 535–548. doi:10.2217/cer-2017-0029