Grounded theories of cognition claim that concept representation relies on the systems for perception and action. The sensory-motor grounding of abstract concepts presents a challenge for these theories. Some accounts propose that abstract concepts are indirectly grounded via image schemas or situations. Recent research, however, indicates that the role of sensory-motor processing for concrete concepts may be limited, providing evidence against the idea that abstract concepts are grounded via concrete concepts. Hybrid models that combine language and sensory-motor experience may provide a more viable account of abstract and concrete representations. We propose that sensory-motor grounding is important during acquisition and provides structure to concepts. Later activation of concepts relies on this structure but does not necessarily involve sensory-motor processing. Language is needed to create coherent concepts from diverse sensory-motor experiences. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain’.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Abstract concepts, Language, Sensory-motor grounding
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0132, hdl.handle.net/1765/108974
Journal Royal Society of London. Philosophical Transactions B. Biological Sciences
Rights no subscription
Citation
Pecher, D, & Zeelenberg, R. (2018). Boundaries to grounding abstract concepts. Royal Society of London. Philosophical Transactions B. Biological Sciences (Vol. 373). doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0132