This study examined the criterion validity of self-reported running-related injuries (RRI) by novice runners. Fifty-eight participants (41 females; age 46 ± 11 yrs) of the “Start-to-Run” program provided self-reports on their RRIs using an online questionnaire. Subsequently, they attended injury consultations with sports medicine physicians who provided physician-reports (blinded for the self-reports) as a reference standard. Self-reports and physician-reports included information on injury location (i.e., hip/groin, upper leg, knee, lower leg, and ankle/foot) and injury type (i.e., muscle-tendon unit, joint, ligament, or bone). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were 100% for all five injury locations. For injury type, sensitivity was low (66% for muscle-tendon unit, 50% for ligament, and 40% for bone) and lowest for joint injuries (17%). In conclusion, the validity of self-reported RRIs by novice runners is good for injury locations but not for injury types. In particular for joint injuries, the validity of novice runners’ self-reports is low. Abbreviations: RRI: Running Related Injury; SMC: Sports Medicine Centre; MTU: Muscle Tendon Unit; PPV: Positive Predictive Value

Additional Metadata
Keywords Athletes, injury location, injury type, running, self-reports, validity
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2018.1492399, hdl.handle.net/1765/109263
Journal Research in Sports Medicine
Citation
Smits, D.W, Backx, F.J.G, Van Der Worp, H. (Henk), van Middelkoop, M, Hartgens, F, Verhagen, E.A.L.M, … Huisstede, B.M.A. (2018). Validity of injury self-reports by novice runners: comparison with reports by sports medicine physicians. Research in Sports Medicine, 1–16. doi:10.1080/15438627.2018.1492399