Tournament-like promotion systems are the default in audit firms, which are generally internally owned professional partnerships. While awarding promotions in a contest-like fashion stimulates contestants’ motivation and productivity, it may also upset an organizations’ ethical climate and trigger ethically adverse behaviors. Since nearly all research on promotion tournaments in management has been conducted in public firms, little is known about how these incentive systems operate in professional partnerships. In this study, we analyze how the perception of the two controllable design parameters of promotion tournaments—the relative pay spread between winners and losers and tournament breadth in terms of the number of contestants that compete for a prize—affects audit firm behavior. Survey results provide evidence that the tournament’s perceived breadth prompts adverse behavior, as it does in public firms. Contrary to conventional wisdom, however, the perceived pay spread has no significant effect on adverse behavior, but triggers desirable behaviors instead. Our study suggests that promotion tournaments indeed provide powerful incentives, but also that understanding the unintended consequences of these incentives on organizational ethical climates and behavior requires tournament theory to be contextualized when it is applied in new settings like internally owned professional partnerships.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Adverse behavior, Audit firms, Incentive systems, Pay spread, Tournament theory
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3991-2, hdl.handle.net/1765/110063
Journal Journal of Business Ethics
Citation
Pruijssers, J.L. (Jorien L.), Heugens, P.P.M.A.R, & van Oosterhout, H.J. (Hans J.). (2018). Winning at a Losing Game? Side-Effects of Perceived Tournament Promotion Incentives in Audit Firms. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3991-2