Forced caesareans: Applying ordinary standards to an extraordinary case
Is it morally justifiable to force non-consenting pregnant women to submit to caesarean surgery to save their fetus in distress? Even though proponents and opponents largely agree on the interests at stake, such as the health and life of the fetus and the respect for bodily integrity and autonomy of pregnant women, they disagree on which moral weight to attach to these interests. This is why disagreements about the justifiability of forced caesareans tend to be pervasive and intractable. To sidestep this deadlock, we will focus on conditions that give rise to the 'caesarean dilemma' in the first place, namely the conflict between inherent norms and values medical professionals are committed to by virtue of being a medical professional. Using the reflective equilibrium, we will test the opponents' and proponents' considered judgments about forced caesareans against the norms and values they - as medical professionals - are committed to and determine whether they are coherent. Subsequently we will identify the proponents' incoherencies between the considered judgments and norms and values they are committed to and conclude that as long as these incoherencies are in place, forced caesareans are morally impermissible.
|Keywords||interests of woman/fetus/father|
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-104828, hdl.handle.net/1765/110296|
|Journal||Journal of Medical Ethics: an international peer-reviewed journal for health professionals and researchers in medical ethics|
M'hamdi, H.I, & de Beaufort, I.D. (2018). Forced caesareans: Applying ordinary standards to an extraordinary case. Journal of Medical Ethics: an international peer-reviewed journal for health professionals and researchers in medical ethics. doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-104828