We examine competing explanations, based on risk and behavioral models, for the profitability of stock selection strategies in emerging markets. We document that both emerging market risk and global risk factors cannot account for the significant excess returns of selection strategies based on value, momentum and earnings revisions indicators. The findings for value and momentum strategies are consistent with the evidence from developed markets supporting behavioral explanations. In addition, for value stocks, the most important behavioral bias appears to be related to underestimation of long-term growth prospects, as indicated by above average earnings revisions for longer post-formation horizons and by quite rapidly improving earnings growth expectations. Furthermore, we find that overreaction effects play a limited role for the earnings revisions strategy, as there is no clear return reversal until five years after portfolio formation, setting this strategy apart from momentum strategies.

, , , , , ,
doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2005.05.002, hdl.handle.net/1765/11140
Emerging Markets Review
Erasmus Research Institute of Management

Hart, J., van Dijk, D., & de Zwart, G. (2005). The success of stock selection strategies in emerging markets: Is it risk or behavioral bias?. Emerging Markets Review, 6(3), 238–262. doi:10.1016/j.ememar.2005.05.002