2018-05-18
Aboriginal Title and Alternative Cartographies
Publication
Publication
Erasmus Law Review , Volume 11 - Issue 1 p. 14- 30
Indigenous claims have challenged a number of orthodoxies within state legal systems, one of them being the kinds of proof that can be admissible. In Canada, the focus has been on the admissibility and weight of oral traditions and histories. However, these novel forms are usually taken as alternative means of proving a set of facts that are not in themselves “cultural”, for example, the occupation by a group of people of an area of land that constitutes Aboriginal title. On this view, maps are a neutral technology for representing culturally different interests within those areas. Through Indigenous land use studies, claimants have been able to deploy the powerful symbolic capital of cartography to challenge dominant assumptions about “empty” land and the kinds of uses to which it can be put. There is a risk, though, that Indigenous understandings of land are captured or misrepresented by this technology, and that what appears neutral is in fact deeply implicated in the colonial project and occidental ideas of property. This paper will explore the possibilities for an alternative cartography suggested by digital technologies, by Indigenous artists, and by maps beyond the visual order.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000098, hdl.handle.net/1765/112650 | |
Erasmus Law Review | |
Erasmus Law Review | |
Organisation | Erasmus School of Law |
Anker, K. (2018). Aboriginal Title and Alternative Cartographies. Erasmus Law Review, 11(1), 14–30. doi:10.5553/ELR.000098 |