2008
Staging, staging procedures, and prognostic factors
Publication
Publication
The guidelines of both the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)1 and the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP)2 recommend the use of [18F]- fluorodeoxyglucose (18-FDG) positron emission tomography (18-FDG-PET) in the work-up of patients with (suspected) lung cancer. The tracer 18-FDG visualizes glucose metabolism and, as a result, does not solely visualize tracer uptake in malignant tissues.3,4 In order to improve the specificity of PET, which ranges between 40 and 100%,5 alternative tracers have been tested.6–8 Cell proliferation can be visualized by a nucleoside analog 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine (18-FLT).8 The specificity for 18-FLT was reported to be as high as 93% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.99), which was not significantly better than by 18-FDG (78%, 95% CI 0.57-0.91). The reported high specificity of 18-FLT was at the expense of a significantly lower sensitivity when compared with 18-FDG (67 % for 18-FLT versus 94 % for 18-FDG).8
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
hdl.handle.net/1765/113003 | |
Organisation | Department of Pulmonology |
Kloover, J, & van Klaveren, R.J. (2008). Staging, staging procedures, and prognostic factors. In Lung Cancer Therapy Annual (pp. 57–90). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/113003
|