The persuasive potential of digital games has been applied to influence the attitude and/or behavior of players in several fields such as marketing, pro-social communication or healthcare. However, a literature review of the different academic definitions used for the concept of persuasive games shows that there is no consensus in the way researchers define persuasive games, or at least, that they are studying persuasive games from different approaches and with different applications in mind. The differences in the way persuasive games are defined and studied are the result of the wide range of possible applications of this practice, but also due to the complexity of the process of persuasion itself and how the specificities of digital games have an influence in this process.

In this paper I present a theoretical model designed to explain the different ways digital games can be used for persuasion, this is, to influence the attitude or behavior of players. This model is based on the conceptual framework of behavior scientist B.J. Fogg, who explained the three different roles interactive technology can play in the process of persuasion (i.e (1) as media, (2) as tools, and (3) as social actors for persuasion). In the theoretical model proposed in this paper it is explained how digital games can play these roles in different ways, taking into consideration the persuasive goal of the game and the level of involvement of the player. The result is an eight dimensional model that establishes relationships between these three variables.

Additional Metadata
Persistent URL
de la Hera Conde-Pumpido, T. (2018). Persuasive Games in Context: A Theoretical Model. Retrieved from

Additional Files
ECREA_The-Persuasive-Roles-of-Digital-Games.pdf Abstract , 75kb