Purpose: The association between body mass index (BMI) and subjective health status before and after cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and 1 year later was compared in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) who did (CR group) and did not receive CR (no-CR group). The aim was to investigate the association between BMI and subjective health status based on the Short Form-12 questionnaire. Methods: Between 2009 and 2011, 242 patients with pPCI with an acute myocardial infarction completed a CR program and were compared with 115 patients in the no-CR group. All patients completed the Short Form-12 questionnaire at baseline, at 12 weeks, and at 1-year followup. The CR program consisted of a 2 sessions per week for 1.5 hours each for 12 weeks. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on BMI: normal weight, overweight, and obese. Results: Compared with patients in the no-CR group, CR group patients in the overweight group significantly improved their subjective health status after CR and these improvements were sustained at 1-year followup. CR patients in the normal weight and obese groups did not significantly improve subjective health status. The overweight patients had the highest improvement in subjective health status (OR = 3.4 post-CR and 5.1 at 1 year of followup). Conclusions: After CR, overweight patients showed the best improvement in subjective health status. CR did not significantly improve subjective health status in normal-weight and obese patients.

Additional Metadata
Keywords cardiac rehabilitation • health-related quality of life •, myocardial infarction • obesity • primary percutaneous coronary, intervention
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1097/hcr.0000000000000260, hdl.handle.net/1765/114179
Journal Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention
Pieters, K., Spronk, A., Sunamura, M, Dulfer, K, ter Hoeve, N., Utens, E.M.W.J, & van Domburg, R.T. (2018). Short- and Longer-Term Association Between Body Mass Index and Health Status in Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention, 38(2), 85–91. doi:10.1097/hcr.0000000000000260