There is an inherent tension between critical care research and data protection. Because of their condition it is not possible to ask for the patients’ informed consent to be enrolled in observational research at the point of admission to the hospital. Often this is not possible at a later moment either. Yet informed consent is the baseline to be enrolled in research with personal data and exceptions must be allowed for by national legislation. This was the case under Directive 95/96/EC and will be the case under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR, Regulation 2016/679 EU) which will replace the Directive from 25 May 2018 onwards. Though being a Regulation and therefore directly applicable in the Member States, the long debate about the research exceptions in the GDPR left many aspects of observational research including the exception to the informed consent principle, mainly to the Member States. It may be assumed that most Member States will leave their present state of the law intact in this respect as that was part of the political compromise. We compared existing national privacy legislation from the perspective of critical care research and found great variation. Although this may not impede the collection of emergency and critical care research with data without prior informed consent in countries which are more responsive to such research, it might be a challenge to exchange such data from the national nodes in European wide research collaboration. We make a case that countries which are not responsive to such research should adapt their legislation in the interests of future critical care patients.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Critical Care Research, Data protection, Emergency research, EU Directive 95/46/EC, Informed consent, Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR)
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwy023, hdl.handle.net/1765/114748
Journal Medical Law Review
Citation
Timmers, M., van Veen, E.-B, Maas, A, & Kompanje, E.J.O. (2018). Will the Eu Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 Inhibit Critical Care Research?. Medical Law Review. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwy023