AAM Factors influencing current low-value follow-up care after basal cell carcinoma and suggested strategies for de-adoption: a qualitative study.
Providing follow-up to low-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC) patients can be considered as low-value care. However, dermatologists still provide substantial follow-up care to this patient group, for reasons not well understood. The aim of this study was to identify factors influencing current BCC follow-up practices among dermatologists and suggested strategies to de-adopt this low-value care. In addition, views of patients regarding follow-up care were explored. A qualitative study was conducted consisting of 18 semi-structured interviews with dermatologists and three focus groups with a total of 17 low-risk BCC-patients who had received dermatological care. The interviews focused on current follow-up practices, influencing factors, and suggested strategies to de-adopt the follow-up care. The focus groups comprised preferred follow-up schedules and providers as well as content of follow-up. All (group)interviews were transcribed verbatim, and analysed by two researchers using Atlas.ti software. Factors influencing current follow-up care practices among dermatologists included complying with patients' preferences, lack of trust in general practitioners (GPs), financial incentives and force of habit. Patients reported varying needs regarding periodic follow-up visits, preferred to be seen by a dermatologist and indicated a need for improved information provision. Suggested strategies by dermatologists to de-adopt the low-value care encompassed educating patients with improved information, educating GPs to increase trust of dermatologists, realising appropriate financial reimbursement and informing dermatologists about the low-value of care. A mixture of factors appear to contribute to current follow-up practices after low-risk BCC. In order to de-adopt this low-value care, strategies should be aimed at dermatologists, GPs as well as patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17594, hdl.handle.net/1765/115276|
|Journal||British Journal of Dermatology|
van Egmond, S, Wakkee, M, van Rengen, A, Bastiaens, M.T, Nijsten, T.E.C, & Lugtenberg, M. (2018). AAM Factors influencing current low-value follow-up care after basal cell carcinoma and suggested strategies for de-adoption: a qualitative study. British Journal of Dermatology. doi:10.1111/bjd.17594