Despite the international recognition of religious freedom as a fundamental human right, recent developments in the United States and Europe reveal that the Islamic faith has been singled out qua Islam for special prohibitions. The question is whether this sectarian approach is compatible with the normative liberal approach to religious freedom that emphasizes egalitarianism and neutrality. The answer to this question is, no. Although religion within the paradigm of liberal political philosophy does not warrant special legal protection qua religion, this article contends that it is equally troublesome to single out religion qua religion for special disfavored treatment, even if the justification is facially neutral. This article uses facially neutral examples, such as: the French burqa-ban case, the Travel Ban project of President Trump, and the anti-Sharia debacle in the state of Oklahoma. This article draws on the dichotomous approach of liberal political philosophy to religion and develops a non-sectarian framework of arguments to defend religious liberty.

Additional Metadata
Keywords First Amendment, Free Exercise, Establishment Clause, Law and Religion, Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy
Persistent URL hdl.handle.net/1765/116732
Journal California Western International Law Journal
Citation
Wahedi, S. (2019). Freedom of Religion and Living Together. California Western International Law Journal, 49, 213–296. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/116732