Personal decisions about health hazards are the main cause of impaired health and premature death. People smoke and eat too much and exercise too little. The lack of preventive efforts is surprising given their proven effectiveness. Arrow’s (1963) classical paper suggested that moral hazard might be a reason for underprevention but Ehrlich and Becker (1972) challenged this explanation. In this paper we show that underprevention might be caused by misperceived probabilities. We derive when and how probability weighting gets in the way of prevention by blurring its benefits. We use a general model of prevention, encompassing several special cases from the literature. We also show how perceived ambiguity makes the problem of underprevention even worse by amplifying the effect of probability weighting.

Additional Metadata
Keywords prevention · probability weighting · likelihood insensitivity · medical decision making
JEL Consumer Economics: Theory (jel D11), Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty: General (jel D80), Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty (jel D81), Financial Institutions and Services (jel G2), Health Production: Nutrition, Mortality, Morbidity, Substance Abuse and Addiction, Disability, and Economic Behavior (jel I12)
Persistent URL hdl.handle.net/1765/118285
Journal Operations Research
Citation
Baillon, A, Bleichrodt, H, Emirmahmutoglu, A., Jaspersen, J., & Peter, R. (2018). When Risk Perception Gets in the Way: Probability Weighting and Underprevention. Operations Research, Accepted. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/118285