Understanding ambidexterity: Managing contradictory tensions between exploration and exploitation in the evolution of digital infrastructure
Prior research on the evolution of digital infrastructure has paid considerable attention to effective strategies for resolving contradictory tensions, yet what we still do not understand is the role of higher-level organizational capabilities that help balance the contradictory tensions that emerge during this evolution. In addressing this gap, two related questions guided our investigation: (1) How do organizations experience and resolve contradictory tensions throughout the evolution of digital infrastructure? and (2) What can we learn about the organizational capabilities that drive strategic actions in resolving these contradictory tensions? We approach these questions using an in-depth case study at RE/MAX LLC, a global real estate franchise. Based on our findings, we propose a theoretical model of digital infrastructure ambidexterity. The model recognizes three pairs of capabilities (identifying and germinating, expanding and legitimizing, and augmenting and implanting) and two supporting factors (leadership and structure) that are key to resolving contradictory tensions during this evolution. This study responds to a recent research call for dynamic process perspectives at multiple levels of analysis. We discuss the implications of this model for research and practice and offer observations for future research.
|Keywords||Ambidexterity, Case Study, Contradictory Tensions, Digital Infrastructure Evolution, Exploration and Exploitation, Organizational Capabilities, Qualitative Research, Real Estate Industry|
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00547, hdl.handle.net/1765/118435|
|Journal||Journal of the Association of Information Systems|
Montealegre, R. (Ramiro), Iyengar, K. (Kishen), & Sweeney, J. (Jeffrey). (2019). Understanding ambidexterity: Managing contradictory tensions between exploration and exploitation in the evolution of digital infrastructure. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 20(5), 647–680. doi:10.17705/1jais.00547