Shipping inspections, detentions, and incidents: an empirical analysis of risk dimensions
Inspections play a key role in keeping vessels safe. Inspection authorities employ different policies to decide which vessels to inspect, including type of vessel, age, and flag. Attention for vessel history is usually restricted only to past detentions. This paper demonstrates that the correlation between the probabilities of detention and (very serious and serious) incidents is very low and that proactive prevention of future incidents is improved by accounting for both risk dimensions, that is, by combining past incident and detention information for targeting highrisk vessels for inspection. Five combined methods are presented to classify vessels based on these two risk dimensions, each of which involves extensive sets of factors. These combined classification methods have predictive power for future incidents. Depending on the applied inspection rate, incorporation of incident risk improves inspection hit rates for vessels with future incidents by 30–50% compared to using only detention information. It is recommended to focus on vessels where both risks are relatively high. A practical example shows how the methods can be applied for inspection selection and for prioritizing inspection areas defined in terms of eight risk domains that include collisions, groundings, engine and hull failures, loss of life, fire, and pollution.
|Maritime safety, inspection policy, vessel-specific risk, detention risk, incident risk, risk domains|
|Maritime Policy and Management: an international journal of shipping and port research|
|Organisation||Department of Econometrics|
Heij, C, & Knapp, S. (2020). Shipping inspections, detentions, and incidents: an empirical analysis of risk dimensions. Maritime Policy and Management: an international journal of shipping and port research. doi:10.1080/03088839.2019.1647362