Structural and contextual approaches to ambidexterity: A meta-analysis of organizational and environmental contingencies
This meta-analysis examines the conditions under which structural and contextual approaches help balance exploration and exploitation. Drawing on heterogeneous samples of prior ambidexterity studies, we apply moderated meta-analytic regression methods to 33,492 organizations sampled in 114 primary studies from 1991 to 2017 to test a contingency model. Our findings suggest that structural separation helps firms of all sizes to balance exploration and exploitation, and that structural separation is more conducive for balancing exploration and exploitation in high technology environments. Also, avoiding a structural separation approach benefits service firms. As research on ambidexterity enters the maturity stage we discuss the implications for future theory development, methodology, and for managers interested in developing ambidextrous organizations.
|Keywords||Ambidexterity, Exploitation, Exploration, Manufacturing and Service Industries, Meta-analysis, Organizational Size, Technology Intensity|
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.04.002, hdl.handle.net/1765/120053|
|Journal||European Management Journal|
Fourné, S.P.L, Rosenbusch, N, Heyden, M.L.M, & Jansen, J.J.P. (2019). Structural and contextual approaches to ambidexterity: A meta-analysis of organizational and environmental contingencies. European Management Journal, 37(5), 564–576. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2019.04.002