Institutional design for water governance assumes the possibility of intentional introduction of policy innovations into the new contexts or amending existing institutions. Such institutional design has been common in the water sector and examples include participatory irrigation management, integrated water resources management plans and water privatization programmes. With increasing application of institutional design across various political, socio-economic and cultural settings, the importance of the context is increasingly accepted. The key question is therefore how to reconcile institutional design and contextual variability. Based on our research on the introduction of water user associations in parts of Turkey, Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan, we conclude that a top-down institutional design implemented nation-wide and not involving multiple stakeholders and engaging their views, is doomed to failure. As analternative, weoffer interactive institutional design, whichis basedoncollaborative approaches to institutional design and treats design as works of assemblage.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Institutional design, Water user associations, Collaborative approaches, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.006, hdl.handle.net/1765/120199
Journal Environmental Science & Policy
Citation
Mukhtarov, F, Fox, Svenja, Mukhamedova, N, & Wegerich, Kai. (2015). Institutional Design in the Face of Contextual Relevance: Water User Associations in Turkey, Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan. Environmental Science & Policy, 53(B), 206–214. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.006