The resource curse hypothesis suggests that countries that are rich in natural resources are more likely to experience poor economic growth and other developmental problems. Latin American countries show a mixed picture, confirming the idea that the resource curse is not a deterministic phenomenon and that dependence on, rather than abundance of, natural resources is associated with developmental failures. When looking beyond the nation state, local communities may benefit from royalties accruing to regional governments, often, though, at the expense of other socioeconomic liabilities (as in the case of negative environmental externalities). The case of Ecuador is in many ways exemplary of the resource curse in Latin America and the failure of policies to overcome the curse. While the country was always a commodity exporter, the intensification of extractive activities and the expansion of the extractive frontier (over the last five decades) intensified the severity of boom‐and‐bust cycles and compromised socio‐environmental values in the vicinity of extractive activity.

, , , , , , , , , ,,

Papyrakis, E., & Pellegrini, L. (2019). The Resource Curse in Latin America. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics / eds. in chief Harry E. Vanden & Gary Prevost (copyright 2019). doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1522