Dutch norms for the Eyberg child behavior inventory: comparisons with other western countries
The Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) is one of the most widely used and well-validated parent rating scales for children’s disruptive behavior. This screening instrument is a short, targetted and easy to implement inventory with good psychometric properties and is normed for different countries, among which the United States, Spain, Sweden and Norway. The ECBI has been successfully used for research and clinical purposes, in several countries including The Netherlands. To date, Dutch studies have relied on Scandinavian or US norm scores. However, this may be problematic because of cross-cultural differences in the degree to which certain behaviors are seen as problematic by parents. The main goal of this paper therefore was to obtain norm scores for The Netherlands among 6462 Dutch children aged 4 to 8 years (Mage = 6.37 years; SD = 1.32; 50.6% boys). In line with previous research, we found small differences on the mean sum scores across children of different ages (intensity scale) and gender (intensity and problem scale). Therefore, Dutch norm scores were provided age- and gender specific. Our results showed that disruptive behavior of children in the most rural areas was reported as occurring less frequently and was seen as less problematic by parents compared to the disruptive behavior of children in less rural areas. Finally, we found that Dutch norm scores on the ECBI were significantly lower than US norm scores, and significantly higher on the intensity scale (but not the problem scale) than Norwegian and Swedish norm scores.
|Keywords||Children . Disruptive behavior . ECBI . Norm scores . Parent-reports|
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9639-1, hdl.handle.net/1765/122525|
|Journal||Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment|
Weeland, J., van Aar, J., & Overbeek, G. (2017). Dutch norms for the Eyberg child behavior inventory: comparisons with other western countries. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. doi:10.1007/s10862-017-9639-1