Design, conduct, and use of patient preference studies in the medical product life cycle: A multi-method study
Objectives: To investigate stakeholder perspectives on how patient preference studies (PPS) should be designed and conducted to allow for inclusion of patient preferences in decision-making along the medical product life cycle (MPLC), and how patient preferences can be used in such decision-making. Methods: Two literature reviews and semi-structured interviews (n = 143) with healthcare stakeholders in Europe and the US were conducted; results of these informed the design of focus group guides. Eight focus groups were conducted with European patients, industry representatives and regulators, and with US regulators and European/Canadian health technology assessment (HTA) representatives. Focus groups were analyzed thematically using NVivo. Results: Stakeholder perspectives on how PPS should be designed and conducted were as follows: 1) study design should be informed by the research questions and patient population; 2) preferred treatment attributes and levels, as well as trade-offs among attributes and levels should be investigated; 3) the patient sample and method should match the MPLC phase; 4) different stakeholders should collaborate; and 5) results from PPS should be shared with relevant stakeholders. The value of patient preferences in decision-making was found to increase with the level of patient preference sensitivity of decisions on medical products. Stakeholders mentioned that patient preferences are hardly used in current decision-making. Potential applications for patient preferences across industry, regulatory and HTA processes were identified. Four applications seemed most promising for systematic integration of patient preferences: 1) benefit-risk assessment by industry and regulators at the marketing-authorization phase; 2) assessment of major contribution to patient care by European regulators; 3) cost-effectiveness analysis; and 4) multi criteria decision analysis in HTA. Conclusions: The value of patient preferences for decision-making depends on the level of collaboration across stakeholders; the match between the research question, MPLC phase, sample, and preference method used in PPS; and the sensitivity of the decision regarding a medical product to patient preferences. Promising applications for patient preferences should be further explored with stakeholders to optimize their inclusion in decision-making.
|Keywords||Decision-making, Health technology assessment, Marketing authorization, Medical products, Patient preferences|
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01395, hdl.handle.net/1765/123061|
|Journal||Frontiers in Pharmacology|
Van Overbeeke, E. (Eline), Janssens, R. (Rosanne), Whichello, C. (Chiara), Bywall, K.S, Sharpe, J. (Jenny), Nikolenko, N. (Nikoletta), … Huys, I. (Isabelle). (2019). Design, conduct, and use of patient preference studies in the medical product life cycle: A multi-method study. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 10. doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01395