Earlier work suggested that subjective life expectancy (SLE) functions as reference point in time trade-off (TTO), but has not tested or modelled this explicitly. In this paper we construct a model based on prospect theory to investigate these predictions more thoroughly. We report the first experimental test of reference-dependence with respect to SLE for TTO and extend this approach to standard gamble (SG). In two experiments, subjects’ SLEs were used to construct different versions of 10-year TTO and SG tasks, with the gauge duration either described as occurring above or below life expectation. Our analyses suggest that both TTO and SG weights were affected by SLE as predicted by prospect theory with SLE as reference point. Subjects gave up fewer years in TTO and were less risk-tolerant in SG below SLE, implying that weights derived from these health state valuation methods for durations below SLE will be biased upwards.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Prospect theory, QALY model, Reference point, Standard gamble, Subjective life expectancy, Time trade-off
JEL Health (jel I1), Intertemporal Choice and Growth (jel D9)
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102318, hdl.handle.net/1765/125951
Journal Journal of Health Economics
Citation
Lipman, S.A. (Stefan A.), Brouwer, W.B.F, & Attema, A.E. (2020). Living up to expectations: Experimental tests of subjective life expectancy as reference point in time trade-off and standard gamble. Journal of Health Economics. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102318