Post-collection Separation of Plastic Waste: Better for the Environment and Lower Collection Costs?
The European Union advocates a plastic waste recycling rate of more than 55%. Even for the Netherlands, which has already invested heavily in recycling plastic waste of households, it will still be a challenge to meet this target. The preferred solution to fulfil this target in the Netherlands is implementing separate collection schemes at the curbside, although some municipalities invested in post-separation. We show, based on data for 2013–2014, that post-collection separation is an advisable alternative, with an increased separation of plastic waste compared with home separation. This is even slightly the case if home separation is combined with a unit-based pricing system for unsorted waste and with a frequent door-to-door collection of plastic waste. Moreover, there are indications that the cost effectiveness of recycling plastic waste increases if post separation is chosen. In addition, some claim that unit-based pricing of unsorted waste is important to create an awareness effect to buy less packaging material. However, based on the combination of post separation and unit-based pricing, we have no indication for such awareness effect as the price effect on the amount of plastic waste is insignificantly small.
|Cost effectiveness, Home separation, Plastic waste, Post separation, Recycling|
|Environmental and Resource Economics|
|Organisation||Erasmus School of Economics|
Dijkgraaf, E, & Gradus, R.H.J.M. (2020). Post-collection Separation of Plastic Waste: Better for the Environment and Lower Collection Costs?. Environmental and Resource Economics. doi:10.1007/s10640-020-00457-6