Background: Grading prostate biopsies has an important role in determining treatment strategy. Histopathological evaluations suffer from interobserver variability and therefore biopsies may be re-evaluated. Objective: To provide insight into the extent of, characteristics associated with and clinical implications of prostate biopsy re-evaluations in daily clinical practice. Methods: Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) by biopsy between October 2015 and April 2016 identified through the Netherlands Cancer Registry were included. The proportion of re-evaluations was assessed and characteristics were compared between patients with and without biopsy re-evaluation. Interobserver concordance of ISUP grade and EAU prognostic risk classification was determined by calculating Cohen’s kappa. Results: Biopsy re-evaluation was performed in 172 (3.3%) of 5214 patients. Primary reason for re-evaluation in patients treated with curative intent was referral to another hospital. Most referred patients treated with curative intent (n = 1856) had no re-evaluation (93.0%, n = 1727). Patients with biopsy re-evaluation were younger and underwent more often prostatectomy compared to patients without re-evaluation. The disagreement rate for ISUP grade was 26.1% and interobserver concordance was substantial (κ-weighted = 0.74). Re-evaluation resulted in 21.1% (n = 14) of patients with localised PCa in a different prognostic risk group. More tumours were downgraded (57.1%) than upgraded (42.9%). Interobserver concordance was very good (κ weighted = 0.85). Conclusion: Pathology review of prostate biopsies is infrequently requested by clinicians in the Netherlands but in a non-negligible minority of patients with localised PCa the pathology review led to a change in prognostic risk group which might impact their treatment.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Gleason grading, interobserver concordance, prostate biopsy, Prostate cancer, risk-stratification
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2020.1806354, hdl.handle.net/1765/129925
Journal Scandinavian Journal of Urology
Citation
van Santvoort, B.W.H. (B. W.H.), Leenders, G.J.H.L, Kiemeney, L.A. (L. A.), van Oort, I.M, Wieringa, S.E. (S. E.), Jansen, H, … Aben, K.K.H. (2020). Histopathological re-evaluations of biopsies in prostate cancer: a nationwide observational study. Scandinavian Journal of Urology. doi:10.1080/21681805.2020.1806354