The actions associated with objects are thought to be automatically activated when processing object names. Recent studies, however, have failed to find evidence for a role of the motor system in long-term memory for objects. One exception is a study by van Dam et al. (2013) in which participants studied object names associated with pressing (e.g., doorbell) or twisting (e.g., jar), followed by pressing or twisting actions in a seemingly unrelated task. In the final memory test, performance for action congruent words was better than for action incongruent words. We aimed to generalize these findings. In Experiments 1 and 2, we found no effect of action congruency on repetition priming in lexical decision and man-made/natural decision. In Experiment 3, the action congruency manipulation was administered immediately after initial study or a day later, just prior to the recognition memory test. We found no effects of action congruency and timing of the action. Finally, Experiment 4 was a direct replication of Experiment 1 of van Dam et al. (2013). Again, we failed to find an effect of poststudy action congruency. Thus, we obtained no evidence for the view that motor actions play a role in long-term memory for objects

, ,
doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000490, hdl.handle.net/1765/132474
Experimental Psychology
Department of Psychology

Zeelenberg, R, Remmers, S, F. Blaauwgeers (Florence), & Pecher, D. (2020). The Influence of Poststudy Action Congruency on Memory Consolidation. Experimental Psychology, 2020(67), 211–223. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000490