Cost-utility analysis compares the monetary cost of health interventions to the associated health consequences expressed using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). At whichthreshold the ratio of both is still acceptable is a highly contested issue. Obtaining societal valuations of the monetary value of a QALY can help in setting such threshold values but it remains methodologically challenging. A recent study applied the well-being valuation approach to calculate such a monetary value using a compensating income variation approach. We explore the feasibility of this approach in a different context, using large-scale panel data from Germany. We investigate several important empirical and conceptual challenges such as the appropriate functional specification of income and the health state dependence of consumption utility. The estimated monetary values range from e20,000-60,000 with certain specifications leading to considerable deviations, underlining persistent practical challenges when applying the well-being valuation methodology to QALYs. Recommendations for future applications are formulated.

Well-being, Survey methodology and data science, Health
hdl.handle.net/1765/133380
SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research
Journal of Choice Modelling
Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM)

Himmler, S.F.W, Stöckel, J, van Exel, N.J.A, & Brouwer, W.B.F. (2020). The Value of Health – Empirical issues when estimating the monetary value of a QALY based on well-being data. Journal of Choice Modelling, (38). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/133380