Expert consensus on moving towards a value-based healthcare system in the Netherlands
A Delphi study
Objectives: While the uptake of value-based health care (VBHC) is remarkable, uncertainty prevails regarding the most important actions and practices in establishing a value-based healthcare system. In this paper, we generate expert consensus on the most important aspects of VBHC. Design: The Delphi technique was used to reach consensus on the most important practices in moving towards a value-based healthcare system. Setting and participants: A Dutch expert panel consisting of nine members participated in a two-round survey. Primary and secondary outcome measures: We developed 39 initial items based on the pioneering literature on VBHC and recent health policies in the Netherlands. Experts rated the importance of each item on a 4-point Likert scale. Experts could change items or add new ones as they saw fit. We retained items that were rated (very) important by ≥80% of the panel. Results: After two survey rounds, 32 items (72%) were included through expert consensus. Experts unanimously agree on the importance of shared decision-making, with this item uniquely obtaining the maximum score. Experts also reached consensus on the importance of outcome measurements, a focus on medical conditions, and full cycles of care. No consensus was reached on the importance of benchmarking. Conclusion: This paper provides new insight into the most important actions and practices for establishing a value-based healthcare system in the Netherlands. Interestingly, several of our findings contrast with the pioneering literature on VBHC. This raises the question whether VBHC’s widespread international uptake indicates its actual implementation, or rather that the original concept primarily serves as an inspiring idea.
|Organisation||Health Care Governance (HCG)|
Steinmann, G, van de Bovenkamp, H.M, Delnoij, D.M.J, Groote, R, & Ahaus, C.T.B. (2021). Expert consensus on moving towards a value-based healthcare system in the Netherlands. BMJ Open. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/134919