In this paper, I investigate the role of public opinion and De Staël’s liberal principles in relation to her psychological image of human nature. De Staël regarded the French Revolution as a new stage of human progress, in which the French people, for the first time, gained a political voice. From her position as a liberal republican, De Staël argues for political progress in the form of civil equality and liberty confirmed by law and political representation, for which public opinion serves as a political tool. I aim to demonstrate that De Staël developed a multi-layered analysis of public opinion as both an emancipatory tool for more equality, justice, and liberty, as well as a discriminating and harmful tool. According to De Staël, human passions play a crucial role in determining the employment and the effects of public opinion, as becomes clear in the case of the trial of Marie-Antoinette.

doi.org/10.21814/eps.4.1.193, hdl.handle.net/1765/136127
Psycho-Oncology
Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam

M van der Hulst, Shosha H.M. Peersmann, E.L.T. (Erica) van den Akker, Linda J. Schoonmade, Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Martha Grootenhuis, & Raphaële R.L. van Litsenburg. (2021). Risk factors for steroid-induced adverse psychological reactions and sleep problems in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Psycho-Oncology (Vol. 30, pp. 1009–1028). doi:10.1002/pon.5654