<p>In many areas such as consumer law or competition law, legislators can opt between two alternative forms of sanctions to remedy wrongdoing: they can impose an infringer to pay either a fine or a compensation. There is a major research gap regarding the infringers’ reactions to the different forms of sanctions. This paper reports an experiment that investigated infringers’ willingness to pay compensation versus fines. Results show that regardless of victim characteristics (whether the victim is a company or an NGO), infringers are willing to pay higher amounts in compensation than in fines, view compensation as more fair and believe compensation is better able to restore their reputation. Compensation and fines did not differ in the extent to which they stimulated infringers’ willingness to take precautionary measures. Participants who inflicted harm to a company rather than an NGO, surprisingly viewed their sanction as more fair, irrespective of the type of sanction in place. Our findings highlight some important strengths of compensation from a infringer’s point of view that are to be weighed in the policy debate.</p>

doi.org/10.1007/s10657-021-09709-2, hdl.handle.net/1765/136624
European Journal of Law and Economics
Erasmus School of Law

PTM (Pieter) Desmet, & F (Franziska) Weber. (2021). Infringers’ willingness to pay compensation versus fines. European Journal of Law and Economics. doi:10.1007/s10657-021-09709-2