The interpretive techniques applied by the European Court of Human Rights are instrumental in filling the vaguely formulated rights-provisions with progressive content, and their use provoked widespread criticism. The article argues that despite the scarcity of explicit references to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, all the ECtHR’s methods and doctrines of interpretation have basis in the VCLT, and the ECtHR has not developed a competing framework. The Vienna rules are flexible enough to accommodate the interpretive rules developed in the ECHR jurisprudence, although effectiveness and evolutive interpretation is favoured – due to the unique nature of Convention – over the more traditional means of interpretation, such as textualism. Applying the VCLT as a normative framework offers unique ways of reconceptualising some of the much-contested means of interpretation in order to increase the legitimacy of the ECtHR.

, , ,
doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000193, hdl.handle.net/1765/137022
Erasmus Law Review
Erasmus Law Review
Erasmus School of Law

Polgári, E. (2021). The Role of the Vienna Rules in the Interpretation of the ECHR. Erasmus Law Review, 14(2). doi:10.5553/ELR.000193