The primary purpose of the paper is to answer the following two questions regarding the performance of the influential Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the Federal Reserve System, in comparison with the forecasts contained in the “Greenbooks” of the professional staff of the Board of Governors: Does the FOMC have expertise, and can it forecast better than the staff? The FOMC forecasts that are analyzed in practice are non-replicable forecasts. In order to evaluate such forecasts, this paper develops a model to generate replicable FOMC forecasts, and compares the staff forecasts, non-replicable FOMC forecasts, and replicable FOMC forecasts, considers optimal forecasts and efficient estimation methods, and presents a direct test of FOMC expertise on non-replicable FOMC forecasts. The empirical analysis of Romer and Romer (2008) is re-examined to evaluate whether their criticisms of the FOMC’s forecasting performance should be accepted unreservedly, or might be open to alternative interpretations.

Additional Metadata
Keywords FOMC forecast, direct test of FOMC expertise, forecast performance, replicable FOMC, staff forecast
Publisher Erasmus School of Economics
Persistent URL hdl.handle.net/1765/13980
Series Econometric Institute Research Papers
Journal Report / Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam
Citation
Franses, Ph.H.B.F, McAleer, M.J, & Legerstee, R. (2008). Does the ROMC have expertise, and can it forecast? (No. EI 2008-33). Report / Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam (pp. 1–26). Erasmus School of Economics. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/13980