Postmaterialism influencing total entrepreneurial activity across nations
The relative stability of differences in entrepreneurial activity across countries suggests that other than economic factors are at play. The objective of this paper is to explore how postmaterialism may explain these differences. A distinction is made between nascent entrepreneurship, new business formation and a combination of the two, referred to as total entrepreneurial activity, as defined within the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). The model is also tested for the rate of established businesses. The measure for postmaterialism is based upon Inglehart’s four-item postmaterialism index. A set of economic, demographic and social factors is included to investigate the independent role postmaterialism plays in predicting entrepreneurial activity levels. In particular, per capita income is used to control for economic effects. Education rates at both secondary and tertiary levels are used as demographic variables. Finally, life satisfaction is included to control for social effects. Data from 27 countries (GEM, World Values Survey and other sources) are used to test the hypotheses. Findings confirm the significance of postmaterialism in predicting total entrepreneurial activity and more particularly, new business formation rates.
|Keywords||comparative analysis of economies, cultural economics, entrepreneurship, macro-economic analysis of economic development, self-employment|
|JEL||New Firms; Startups (jel M13), Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development (jel O11), Comparative Studies of Countries (jel O57), Comparative Studies of Particular Economies (jel P52), Cultural Economics; Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology (jel Z1)|
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00191-006-0046-0, hdl.handle.net/1765/15776|
|Series||ERIM Top-Core Articles|
|Journal||Journal of Evolutionary Economics|
Uhlaner, L.M, & Thurik, A.R. (2007). Postmaterialism influencing total entrepreneurial activity across nations. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(2), 161–185. doi:10.1007/s00191-006-0046-0