Microsimulation models are increasingly used in the evaluation of cancer screening. Latent parameters of such models can be estimated by optimization of the goodness-of-fit. We compared the efficiency and accuracy of the Response Surface Methodology and the Nelder and Mead Simplex Method for optimization of microsimulation models. To this end, we tested several automated versions of both methods on a small microsimulation model, as well as on a standard set of test functions. With respect to accuracy, Response Surface Methodology performed better in case of optimization of the microsimulation model, whereas the results for the test functions were rather variable. The Nelder and Mead Simplex Method performed more efficiently than Response Surface Methodology, both for the microsimulation model and the test functions.

health, optimization, simulation
hdl.handle.net/1765/1595
Econometric Institute Research Papers
Erasmus School of Economics

Neddermeijer, H.G, Piersma, N, van Oortmarssen, G.J, Habbema, J.D.F, & Dekker, R. (1999). Comparison of response surface methodology and the Nelder and Mead simplex method for optimization in microsimulation models (No. EI 9924-/A). Econometric Institute Research Papers. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/1595