Expert opinion is an opinion given by an expert, and it can have significant value in forecasting key policy variables in economics and finance. Expert forecasts can either be expert opinions, or forecasts based on an econometric model. An expert forecast that is based on an econometric model is replicable, and can be defined as a replicable expert forecast (REF), whereas an expert opinion that is not based on an econometric model can be defined as a non-replicable expert forecast (Non-REF). Both replicable and non-replicable expert forecasts may be made available by an expert regarding a policy variable of interest. In this paper we develop a model to generate replicable expert forecasts, and compare REF with Non-REF. A method is presented to compare REF and Non-REF using efficient estimation methods, and a direct test of expertise on expert opinion is given. The latter serves the purpose of investigating whether expert adjustment improves the model-based forecasts. Illustrations for forecasting pharmaceutical SKUs, where the econometric model is of (variations of) the ARIMA type, show the relevance of the new methodology proposed in the paper. In particular, experts possess significant expertise, and expert forecasts are significant in explaining actual sales.

Additional Metadata
Keywords direct test, efficient estimation, expert opinion, forecasts, generated regressors, non-replicable expert forecast, replicable expert
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2009.00426.x, hdl.handle.net/1765/16372
Series Econometric Institute Reprint Series
Journal Statistica Neerlandica
Citation
Franses, Ph.H.B.F, McAleer, M.J, & Legerstee, R. (2009). Expert opinion versus expertise in forecasting. Statistica Neerlandica, 63(3), 334–346. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9574.2009.00426.x