2010-03-01
Alignment 2.0: Strategic use of new internet technologies in government
Publication
Publication
Government Information Quarterly: an international journal of information technology management, policies, and practices , Volume 27 - Issue 2 p. 113- 121
This paper challenges the view that strategies for using Web 2.0 should primarily be based upon technological characteristics. The value of the organizational strategic alignment approach for developing specific operational Web 2.0 strategies for government organizations is explored both theoretically and empirically. On the basis of a review of the literature we conclude that there are no a priori reasons why the idea of a fit between IT strategy and business strategic orientation cannot be applied to the development of operational Web 2.0 strategies for government organizations. The empirical exploration based on intervention research at the Dutch Department of Education results in the identification of five configurations: organizational transparency, organizational interactions, policy sector transparency, policy sector interactions and process and policy innovation. These configurations are logically consistent with the strategic orientations of the three directorates of the Department of Education. This overview does not pretend to be exhaustive but validates the idea that an alignment approach leads to differences in operational strategies. The configuration approach provides organizations with useful a starting point for developing their Web 2.0 strategies.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
, , | |
doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.001, hdl.handle.net/1765/19211 | |
Government Information Quarterly: an international journal of information technology management, policies, and practices | |
Organisation | Department of Public Administration |
Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2010). Alignment 2.0: Strategic use of new internet technologies in government. Government Information Quarterly: an international journal of information technology management, policies, and practices, 27(2), 113–121. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.001 |