This paper investigates whether China has escaped the vulnerabilities of peripheral and dependent late industrialisation in the build up to the current global economic crisis, with reference to structuralist critiques of Latin American industrialisation in the 1960s and examined through China’s balance of payments data. While it would seem that China’s huge surpluses amid sustained growth eliminate any comparative relevance to Latin America, the paper argues that analogous vulnerabilities exist. These were more evident before China’s spectacular surplus surge in the 2000s, although even in the midst of the surge, volatility on the capital account and in the errors of omissions was ominous. Changes on the trade account also reflect China’s relatively subordinate position within the massive rerouting of international production networks via China that followed the East Asian crisis, for the most part led by Northern transnational corporations. In sum, overly optimistic appraisals of China’s strength underestimate many of its persisting structural vulnerabilities as a contemporary developing country and distract attention away from important lessons for other developing countries.

China, balance of payments, global imbalances, international production networks, late industrialisation, structuralism, transnational corporations
International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University (ISS)
hdl.handle.net/1765/19431
ISS Working Papers - General Series
ISS Working Paper Series / General Series
International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University (ISS)

Fischer, A.M. (2010). Is China turning Latin?. ISS Working Paper Series / General Series (Vol. 496, pp. 1–27). International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University (ISS). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/19431